Strategic Utilization of Google Sites to Support ICT Learning Management in Madrasah Education

Authors

  • Rahma Alia UIN Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Firdaus Annas Universitasi Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57255/jemast.v4i2.1646

Keywords:

ICT Learning Management, Learning Strategy, Google Sites, Web-Based Learning, Madrasah Education

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) learning requires effective digital media utilization strategies to support flexible and adaptive learning management. However, studies examining strategic use of web-based platforms, particularly Google Sites, in the context of madrasah education remain limited. This study aims to describe the strategy of utilizing Google Sites as a digital learning medium to support ICT learning management at MA Asy Syarif Sidang Koto Laweh. This study employed a descriptive approach involving 15 students as participants. The implementation strategy included needs analysis, design of media structure and interface, organization of learning content such as materials, videos, and PDF documents, and integration of evaluation through Google Forms with automated scoring. Data were collected through observation and student response questionnaires and analyzed descriptively to illustrate both the process and outcomes of the implemented learning strategy. The results indicate that the use of Google Sites as part of a digital learning strategy supports more structured learning management, provides easy access across multiple devices, and enhances student engagement. Students demonstrated positive responses, particularly toward video-based materials and the automated evaluation system, which facilitated the learning process. This study focuses on the implementation of learning strategies rather than effectiveness testing. The findings offer practical contributions for teachers in designing web-based learning strategies and provide academic insights into the development of digital learning management and strategy in madrasah contexts.

References

Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155.

Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2020). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1964–1985.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13026

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

Kimmons, R. (2015). Open online course design: The value of openness in teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 55(3), 27–32.

Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE model and universal design for learning principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1494521

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155.

Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2020). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1964–1985. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13026

Burbules, N. C. (2012). Ubiquitous learning and the future of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.006

Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., & Bichsel, J. (2014). The current ecosystem of learning management systems. Educause Review.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. Handbook of Distance Education.

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics for study success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09744-6

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). A comprehensive framework for teacher ICT competence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Published

2026-04-26

How to Cite

Rahma Alia, & Annas, F. (2026). Strategic Utilization of Google Sites to Support ICT Learning Management in Madrasah Education. Journal of Educational Management and Strategy, 4(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.57255/jemast.v4i2.1646

Citation Check