Developing a Decision Support System for Assessing Bantara Rank Promotion Eligibility among Secondary School Scouts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57255/intellect.v5i01.1666Keywords:
Agile Scrum, Bantara Rank Promotion, Decision Support System, Eligibility Assessment , Weighted Scoring ModelAbstract
Assessing student eligibility for Bantara rank promotion requires an objective and systematic decision-making process. This study aimed to develop a technology-based decision support system to assist scout supervisors in evaluating students’ eligibility for Bantara rank promotion at a secondary school. The system was developed using the Scrum framework within an Agile development approach, including product backlog preparation, sprint planning, sprint implementation, sprint review, and retrospective activities. The development process was conducted over six weeks, comprising 26 effective working days. The system applied the Weighted Scoring Model to calculate and determine students’ promotion eligibility. The evaluation results showed a validity score of 0.97, a practicality score of 0.615, and an average effectiveness score of 0.93. These findings indicate that the developed system met the evaluation criteria used in the study and was considered feasible for supporting Bantara promotion assessments. The system provides a more structured basis for decision-making and may assist scout supervisors in conducting student assessments more consistently and objectively.
Abstrak
Penilaian kelayakan siswa untuk kenaikan pangkat Bantara memerlukan proses pengambilan keputusan yang objektif dan sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan sistem pendukung keputusan berbasis teknologi guna membantu pembina pramuka dalam mengevaluasi kelayakan siswa untuk kenaikan pangkat Bantara di sebuah sekolah menengah. Sistem ini dikembangkan menggunakan kerangka kerja Scrum dalam pendekatan pengembangan Agile, yang mencakup persiapan product backlog, perencanaan sprint, pelaksanaan sprint, tinjauan sprint, dan kegiatan retrospektif. Proses pengembangan berlangsung selama enam minggu, yang terdiri dari 26 hari kerja efektif. Sistem ini menerapkan Model Penilaian Berbobot untuk menghitung dan menentukan kelayakan siswa dalam promosi. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan skor validitas sebesar 0,97, skor kepraktisan sebesar 0,615, dan skor efektivitas rata-rata sebesar 0,93. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa sistem yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria evaluasi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dan dianggap layak untuk mendukung penilaian promosi Bantara. Sistem ini menyediakan landasan yang lebih terstruktur untuk pengambilan keputusan dan dapat membantu pembina pramuka dalam melakukan penilaian siswa secara lebih konsisten dan objektif.
Downloads
References
[1] S. Suratman, M. F. Muttaqin, and ..., “Internalisasi Nilai Karakter Melalui Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Pramuka Di Sekolah Dasar,” Pedagog. J. …, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/pedagogi/article/view/9526
[2] A. P. Rahayu and Y. Dong, “The Relationship of Extracurricular Activities with Students’ Character Education and Influencing Factors: A Systematic Literature Review,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 459–474, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2968.
[3] I. A. Khoirroni, R. Patinasarani, N. I. Hermayanti, and G. Santoso, “Pendidikan Karakter: Tingkat Anak Sekolah Dasar di Era Digital Inayah,” Jupetra, vol. 02, no. 02, pp. 269–279, 2023.
[4] Y. Rifa’i, “Manajemen Konflik Kebijakan Pembina Pramuka Terhadap Kewajiban Mengikuti Penegak Bantara dan Laksana Bagi Siswa di Madrasah Aliyah YPP Jamanis,” J. Pelita Nusant., 2023, [Online]. Available: http://glorespublication.org/index.php/jupenus/article/view/156
[5] Denis Desfriyati, Mustika Khoirunnisa Kholillah, Nurassyifa Qurotul Aini, and Randita Lestari, “Analisis Hambatan Pelaksanaan Ekstrakurikuler Pramuka Sekolah Dasar Di Kabupaten Bandung,” CENDEKIA J. Ilmu Sos. Bhs. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 123–131, 2023, doi: 10.55606/cendikia.v4i1.2300.
[6] D. Zaelani, A. Sulistyohati, and S. Khotijah, “BERPRESTASI MENGGUNAKAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT,” vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025.
[7] S. A. Maulana, S. H. Batubara, and W. A. Harahap, “Decision Support System for Determining Tutoring Institutions for SNBT Preparation Using the Weighted Product Method,” vol. 2, no. April, pp. 99–113, 2024.
[8] Z. Marzuki and H. A. Musril, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akademik Siswa menggunakan,” J. Edukasi Elektro, vol. 05, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jee
[9] L. Adyana, H. Leslie, and H. Spits, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentu Penerima Reward Guru Dengan Metode Weighted Product ( WP ),” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 122–129, 2021.
[10] H. F. Al-ghovari, L. Efriyanti, S. Zakir, and R. Okra, “Perancangan Sistem Aplikasi Penentuan Jurusan di SMKN 1 Bukittinggi Berdasarkan Hasil Tes Dengan Menggunakan Bahasa Pemograman PHP Pendahuluan Metode Hasil dan Pembahasan,” J. Multidisiplin Ilmu, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 115–131, 2022.
[11] J. Sistem, I. Cendekia, and J. Hutahaean, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor IT Dengan Metode WSM Weighted Scoring Model,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 38–46, 2024.
[12] D. A. Nusantara, J. Pendidikan, B. Vol, and O. S. Arrahmaniyah, “Research And Development ( R & D ) Penelitian Yang Inovatif Dalam Pendidikan,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.
[13] C. Ramadhan, M. A. Senubekti, and D. Amalia, “Penerapan Metodologi Agile dalam Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak,” vol. 3, no. 2, 2025.
[14] L. Oleh, T. I. M. Startup, and D. I. Indonesia, “Edusaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi,” vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 570–587, 2024.
[15] M. Irdina et al., “Pengembangan Basis Data Website Radyakartiyasa m enggunakan Headless CMS Directus Website Database Development for Radyakartiyasa u sing the Directus Headless CMS,” vol. 14, pp. 2930–2942, 2025.
[16] E. Triantaphyllou and S. H. Mann, “An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 303–312, 1989, doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(89)90037-7.
[17] A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. M. D. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, and A. Valipour, “Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014,” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 516–571, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139.
[18] S. Srivastava, A. Tripathi, and N. Arora, “Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) in diverse domains of education: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for research directions,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13198-024-02332-9.
[19] J. Teixeira, S. Alves, P. Mariz, and F. Almeida, “Decision support system for the selection of students for Erasmus+ short-term mobility,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 70–84, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-03-2022-0101.
[20] A. M. Alshamsi, H. El-Kassabi, M. A. Serhani, and C. Bouhaddioui, “A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for data-driven distance learning recommendations,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 10421–10458, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11589-9.
[21] T. Dingsøyr, S. Nerur, V. Balijepally, and N. B. Moe, “A decade of Agile methodologies: Towards explaining Agile software development,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1213–1221, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033.
[22] M. Hron and N. Obwegeser, “Why and how is Scrum being adapted in practice: A systematic review,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 183, Art. no. 111110, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111110.
[23] T. Mijač, M. Jadrić, and M. Ćukušić, “Measuring the success of information systems in higher education—A systematic review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 18323–18360, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12564-8.
[24] W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wawan Fadhilah, Riri Okra, Hari Antoni Musril, Sarwo Derta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
