Students’ Ability in Writing Recount Text at The Second Grade Students of MTS Bai’aturridhwan Bukittinggi

Authors

  • Anna Tsuraya Pratiwi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Gusmaizal Syandri Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
  • Erlinda Syam Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57255/jemast.v2i2.253

Keywords:

Students’ Ability, Writing Recount Text, MTS Bai’aturridhwan Bukittinggi

Abstract

Recount text is a type of text taught in English subjects at the junior high school or MTs level. This research aims to determine students' abilities in writing recount text. Data was obtained through a writing test given to students. The students' writing results were then examined by looking at five components, namely content, organization, grammar, vocabulary and mechanics. The data was then described using qualitative methods. The research results show that students' ability to write recount text is low. This can be seen from the average score between 56 and 65. This proves that students still experience difficulties in writing, so the quality of their writing is less than satisfactory.

Abstrak

Teks recount adalah salah satu jenis teks yang diajarkan pada mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris pada tingkat SMP atau MTs. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan siswa dalam menulis teks recount. Data didapatkan melalui tes menulis yang diberikan pada siswa . Hasil menulis siswa lalu diteliti dengan  melihat lima komponen, yaitu content, organization, grammar, vocabularies dan mechanics. Data lalu diseskripsikan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan siswa dalam menulis teks recount adalah rendah. Ini terlihat dari perolehan nilai rata-rata antara 56 sampai dengan 65. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa siswa masih mengalami kesulitan dalam menulis, sehingga kualitas tulisannya kurang memuaskan.

References

Aan Raimes. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: OxfordUniversity Press, p. 129

A.S. Hornby. (1963). The Advanced Leaner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University press

Brown H. Duglas. (2004). Language Assessment; Principles and Classroom Practices.

Library of Congress Catalog in-Publication Data, P 244

Christopher Tribble. (1996). Language Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, p.130

David Nunan. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw Hill Companies, p. 98

Farida Nugrahani. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Surakarta, p. 4

H-Douglas Brown.(2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.

I.S.P.Nation. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge, p. 113

Jeremy Harmer. (2004). How to Teach Writing. England: Pearson Education Limited, p. 4 John Langan. (2005). College Writing Skills with Readings (Sixth Edition). New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

KenHyland,(2003). Second Language Writing. Hongkong: Cambridge University Press, p.124

Mahsun. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: tahapan, strategi, metode dan tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, p. 30

Mark and Kathy Anderson. (1997). Text Types in English 1. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, p.12

Peter Knapp and Megan Watkins. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar. Australia: University of New South Wales Press Ltd

Richard. J. C and Renandya. W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching an Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press, p. 303

Sanggam Siahaan and Kisno Shinoda. (2008). Generic Text Structure. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, p. 1

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, p.2

Downloads

Submitted

2023-11-07

Published

2023-11-13

How to Cite

Tsuraya Pratiwi, A., Syandri, G. ., & Syam, E. . (2023). Students’ Ability in Writing Recount Text at The Second Grade Students of MTS Bai’aturridhwan Bukittinggi. Journal of Educational Management and Strategy, 2(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.57255/jemast.v2i2.253